Pavel Durov’s Arrest: Shockwaves Through Crypto, TON, and Data Privacy

Posted on by Werner

The authorities have struck another blow against crypto. Pavel Durov, the mysterious 39-year-old Russian-born billionaire and founder of the popular messaging app Telegram, was arrested in Paris on 26 August, 2024. 

This high-profile collaring sent ripples through the tech industry, particularly affecting the cryptocurrency markets due to Durov’s relationship with The Open Network (TON) and raising significant concerns about data privacy in the age of Web3. Let’s delve into the details of this incident and its far-reaching consequences.

The Arrest: Charges and Aftermath

French authorities, specifically the Office for the Protection of Minors on the Internet (OFMIN), issued an arrest warrant for Durov over a range of serious accusations. The charges arise from activities on Telegram including:

  • Organized crime
  • Drug trafficking
  • Fraud
  • Cyberbullying
  • Promotion of terrorism on Telegram

The prosecutors will need to show that Telegram failed to adequately moderate its content and curb illegal activities by users and groups on the platform.

Durov was held in police and judicial custody for two days before being released on bail. The incident immediately impacted the crypto markets, with Toncoin (TON), a cryptocurrency closely associated with Telegram, experiencing a 20% drop in value within 24 hours of the news. This wiped out approximately $2.7 billion in market value.

Credit: Tesfu Assefa

Telegram and TON’s Symbiosis

To understand the full implications of Durov’s arrest, it’s crucial to examine the relationship between Telegram and the TON blockchain.

The TON Blockchain

The Open Network (TON) is a blockchain project initially developed by Telegram in 2018. It was abandoned when US regulators came after them them for promoting a security asset and forced them to return $1.2 billion raised in their Initial Coin Offering (ICO).

However, the project was soon revived by the crypto community in 2021 (crypto folks love to use the word CTO or ‘community take over’) and has maintained close ties with Telegram ever since. It has become one of the hottest layer-1 chains in 2024 and has seen various Tap-to-Play games like NotCoin and Hamster Kombat attract hundreds of millions of users thanks to the ability to earn crypto from airdrops and points rewards. 

Alex Thorn, Galaxy Digital’s head of research, emphasized in a report that the value of the TON blockchain and its native token, toncoin (TON), are “substantially dependent” on its ties to Telegram. The downside of being close with Telegram? When their founder Pavel Druov gets arrested, Toncoin immediately takes a tumble on the market.

Market Impact

The arrest triggered significant market activity:

  • Toncoin lost $2.7 billion in market value, dropping 20% within 24 hours.
  • In the 24 hours following the news, $8.2 million in liquidations occurred across the crypto market – $3.82 million from long positions and $4.20 million from short positions.
  • Traders bet almost $70 million, causing TON’s open interest in future markets to jump 32%.
  • As of 30 August, 2024, Toncoin’s price stood at $5.35, showing signs of resistance.

Interestingly, not all TON-related tokens suffered. The DOGS token, a memecoin launched on the TON blockchain with much fanfare and a big airdrop, saw a 23% surge, reaching a market cap of $789 million. This demonstrates the complex and sometimes counterintuitive nature of crypto markets in response to major events. It was also the perfect vehicle for crypto natives to show solidarity with the #FreePavel campaign. 

Credit: CoinMarketCap

Web3 and Telegram’s Data Privacy Concerns

Durov’s arrest shines a light on the struggle between privacy-focused platforms and government efforts to combat illegal activities online. This tension is particularly relevant in the context of Web3, where data privacy is a basic principle. 

Telegram’s Privacy Features

Telegram, with its estimated 800 million users, has long been criticized for its perceived lack of moderation. However, its end-to-end encryption and commitment to user privacy have made it a popular choice for those seeking to avoid surveillance, including both legitimate users and malicious actors. Durov is a fierce advocate for censorship resistance, all the way back to his VKontakte days, and has appeared to be willing to die on his shield several times, even after Russian authorities put pressure on him during the 2012 Russian protests.

Credit: Werner Vermaak

The Balancing Act

Privacy-focused platforms must strike a balance between protecting user privacy and complying with local laws in 2024, especially if they’re non-US. Pavel’s arrest shows what happens when you mis-judge this delicate legal balancing act.

It’s increasingly challenging to operate a global service under varying national regulations, particularly in light of the European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA) and similar legislation worldwide.

Potential Shift to Decentralized Alternatives?

With Telegram’s network distribution and TON’s blockchain capabilities, can we expect to see more interest in truly decentralized alternatives after Durov’s arrest? Very likely. These alternatives can better withstand legal and regulatory pressures. 

The crypto community, which relies heavily on privacy-preserving technologies and resistant communication channels, view this encroachment on freedom of speech and freedom of finances as very dystopian. They may turn to blockchain-based messaging solutions that are inherently more resistant to censorship and surveillance.

The TON Blockchain Outage

In a case of bad timing, the TON blockchain went down for nearly six hours on 29 August, 2024. This disruption was caused by a surge in network traffic, possibly linked to the recent airdrop of the DOGS memecoin.

The TON blockchain team explained on Twitter: “Several validators are unable to clean the database of old transactions, which has led to losing the consensus.” They assured users that “no cryptocurrency assets will be lost due to the issue”.

This outage, coming on the heels of Durov’s arrest, raises questions about the resilience of blockchain networks closely associated with centralized entities like Telegram. Maybe they’re not decentralized enough? On the other hand, outages are almost a rite of passage for most blockchains as they scale, and top chains like Solana are notorious for it.

The Future of Privacy Tech and Crypto

The outcome of Durov’s case could set important precedents for how aggressively authorities pursue tech leaders over content moderation issues, and the responsibilities of platforms under regulatory frameworks like the European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA). It may also influence debates about encryption, backdoors, and the role of technology companies in moderating content.

Potential Outcomes

  1. Increased scrutiny on how cryptocurrency and related technologies are discussed and promoted on messaging platforms.
  2. New compliance challenges for crypto projects and crypto exchanges.
  3. Innovation in decentralized communication tools built on blockchain technology.
  4. A shift in how encrypted communication platforms are understood and regulated.

Conclusion: A Web3 Watershed?

Pavel Durov’s arrest is an important beat in the ongoing story between privacy-preserving technologies, blockchain ecosystems, and regulators. As the case unfolds, it will spark intense debates about the proper balance between law enforcement, user privacy, and the role of technology companies in moderating content.

Durov’s release on bail provides some comfort, but he’s still a regulatory target. And if the 120th richest person in the world can get in trouble for going too far with speech that offends the powers that be, anyone can. 

Let us know your thoughts! Sign up for a Mindplex account now, join our Telegram, or follow us on Twitter. 

Sui: Crypto’s New Object of Affection

Posted on by Werner

Introduction

In bearish market conditions, one blockchain has stood out for its recent upward price action and news, which is finally beginning to match its promise as a very unique and powerful decentralized network which can compete with older chains like Ethereum, Solana and Cardano.

Sui is a next-generation layer-1 blockchain platform that’s turning Web3 heads with its object-based design that enables a promise of more speed, scalability, and user-friendliness. 

Headquartered in San Francisco and developed by the bright minds at Mysten Labs, former employees of Facebook and its doomed Diem project, Sui aims to make Web3 technology more accessible and user-friendly.

What is Sui?

In essence, Sui is a layer-1 blockchain with a novel approach to transaction processing. Launched in May 2023, it’s aiming to be a blockchain that’s as easy to use as your favorite social media app – that’s Sui’s ultimate goal.

Its name is derived from the Chinese word for ‘water’, symbolizing its adaptability and ease of use in the Web3 space.

Key Challenges Sui Aims to Solve

Sui is addressing several critical issues in blockchain:

  1. Scalability: Sui’s architecture is designed to scale horizontally, maintaining performance as network demand grows.
  2. Transaction fees: Sui’s efficient processing aims to keep fees low and predictable, even during peak usage.
  3. User experience: Sui focuses on simplifying the user interface to make blockchain technology more accessible.
  4. Programmability: Through the Move language, Sui offers enhanced flexibility for developers.
  5. Efficiency of data handling: Sui’s object-centric model allows unrelated transactions to be processed in parallel, significantly improving efficiency.

Key Features

Sui boasts several innovative features:

  • Horizontal scalability: Network capacity can expand by adding more nodes.
  • Low-latency transactions: Processes transactions with minimal delay.
  • Object-centric data model: Enables parallel processing of independent transactions.
  • Move programming language: Enhances security and simplifies digital asset management.
  • Byzantine fault-tolerant proof-of-stake consensus: Ensures network security and efficiency.

The Move Programming Language

Move, Sui’s programming language is specifically designed for secure and flexible smart contract development in blockchain environments (and it’s also used by Aptos). It focuses on securely managing resources and building flexible smart contracts.

Key features of Move include:

  • Resource-oriented programming
  • Static type system
  • Formal verification capabilities
  • Efficient module system

By treating assets as first-class citizens, Move allows developers to implement complex payment logic with a high degree of safety and efficiency. This approach significantly reduces the risk of common vulnerabilities found in other blockchain systems.

The combination of these features makes Move particularly well-suited for blockchain environments:

  1. Security: The resource-oriented approach, and the static typing, help prevent common vulnerabilities like reëntrancy attacks or double-spending.
  2. Efficiency: Move’s design allows for efficient execution, crucial for blockchain systems where computational resources are limited.
  3. Flexibility: Despite its focus on safety, Move remains flexible enough to implement complex smart contract logic.

In the context of Sui, developers can create complex, interrelated objects that mirror real-world assets and relationships, all while benefiting from Move’s strong safety guarantees.

Developers building a decentralized finance (DeFi) application on Sui could define custom tokens using Move, create complex financial instruments, and implement sophisticated trading logic, all with a high degree of safety and efficiency. The ability to mathematically verify the correctness of critical functions provides extra peace of mind.

Credit: Tesfu Assefa

How SUI Works

Sui’s key innovation is its object-centric model. Instead of the usual account-based system, Sui treats everything as objects. Your coins, NFTs, and even the programs running on Sui are all objects.

 In Sui’s object model, there are three types of object ownership:

  1. Owned by an address: Objects like coins or NFTs owned by a specific user address.
  2. Owned by another object: For example, an NFT that is part of a larger collection.
  3. Shared: Objects that can be accessed and modified by multiple users.

This model enables Sui to process independent transactions concurrently, increasing throughput and reducing latency. By executing unrelated transactions in parallel, Sui achieves higher transaction processing speeds than traditional blockchain architectures.

The object-centric model also simplifies the development of complex applications, particularly those involving digital assets. Developers can create and manage assets as distinct objects with their own properties and behaviors, leading to more intuitive and efficient smart contract design.

SUI Tokenomics

The native token of the Sui network, SUI, serves several key functions:

  • Gas fees: Used to pay for transaction fees on the network.
  • Staking: Validators and delegators can stake SUI to participate in network security and earn rewards.
  • Governance: SUI token holders can participate in on-chain governance decisions.

The total supply of SUI tokens is capped at 10 billion. This fixed supply model is designed to create scarcity and potentially drive value as network usage increases. SUI tokens have a distribution and vesting schedule designed to incentivize long-term participation in the network and align the interests of developers, users, and investors.

What Drove the Recent SUI Price Surge?

Credit: CoinMarketCap

After suffering with all other coins during Black Monday’s market crash, Sui recently experienced significant growth, driven by two key events:

  1. Mysticeti Upgrade: On August 6, Sui’s mainnet was upgraded to Mysticeti, increasing its theoretical transaction processing capacity to 297,000 TPS. This upgrade demonstrated Sui’s commitment to continuous improvement and its potential to handle large-scale adoption.
  2. Grayscale Trust: On August 7, Grayscale introduced its SUI Trust for accredited investors, potentially increasing institutional interest in the token. This development signaled growing recognition of Sui in the traditional finance sector.

Bridging the Web2 to Web3 Gap

Sui is on a mission to make blockchain technology more accessible to the average person. Here’s how:

  • Easy wallet creation: Use your Gmail or Face ID – no need to remember another password.
  • No more seed phrases: This addresses a pain point for crypto users.
  • QR code transactions: As easy as scanning your boarding pass.
  • User-friendly interface: If you can use Facebook, you can use Sui.

SUI Ecosystem Overview

Despite its relative novelty, Sui is building a diverse ecosystem. Notable projects include:

  • Ocean DEX: A hybrid central limit order book and automated market maker decentralized exchange.
  • Ethos Wallet: A web3 wallet for Sui with simple email registration.
  • SuiNS: The Sui Name Service, providing human-readable addresses for Sui wallets.
  • Navi Protocol: A money market protocol contributing to Sui’s recent increase in TVL (total value locked)
  • Artificial intelligence-focused protocols like Atoma and Walrus

Cross-chain bridges like Axelar Network and Wormhole interoperate with other major blockchains. Users can transfer assets across these bridges that link Sui to other blockchain networks. This brings more liquidity Sui-based tokens, and expands the set of use-cases and market size for Sui-based applications.

The growth of Sui’s ecosystem is crucial for its long-term success. It currently has a total value locked (TVL) of just under $600 million according to DeFiLlama with the top tokens commanding comparatively small market caps, the biggest at $70 million and the 20th with a fully diluted cap of under $1 million if CoinMarketCap Sui Ecosystem data is accurate.

A diverse range of applications and services built on Sui is therefore crucial if it wants to grow and attract the best developers and investors.

Sui vs Solana: A Concise Comparison

Sui and Solana are both high-performance blockchain platforms, but they differ significantly in their approach:

Sui uses an object-centric model with the Move language, enabling parallel processing of independent transactions and native sharding.Solana uses an account-based model with the Rust language, utilizing a global state and Proof of History consensus.

While Sui’s architecture potentially allows for greater scalability through horizontal expansion, Solana focuses on optimizing single-node performance. Sui offers sub-second finality for single-owner transactions, whereas Solana provides this for all transactions.

Is Sui a ‘Solana killer’?

It’s premature to make such a claim. While Sui’s innovative approach shows promise, Solana has an established ecosystem, massive user numbers (thanks in no small part to memecoins) and a proven track record. Rather than displacing Solana, Sui may carve out its own niche, particularly in use-cases that benefit from its object-centric model and Move language capabilities. The blockchain space is vast, with room for multiple successful platforms serving different needs.

Conclusion

Sui is working hard to solve massive challenges in the blockchain industry. Its innovative features, growing ecosystem, and focus on user experience position it as a noteworthy player in the layer-1 blockchain space. 

As Sui continues to develop and attract projects, it has the potential to significantly impact the future of decentralized applications and Web3 technologies.

However, like any new technology, Sui faces challenges and competition. Its success will depend on its ability to deliver on its promises of high performance and scalability, attract and retain developers, and build a robust and diverse ecosystem of applications. This is a big task, but it’s one that all major blockchain networks have had to undertake.

Let us know your thoughts! Sign up for a Mindplex account now, join our Telegram, or follow us on Twitter. 

New Age of Terrain Classification: Proprioceptive Sensors and Uncertainty Quantification

Posted on by Basliel

The challenges of Terrain Classification

Terrain classification (TC) in rover exploration has traditionally relied on computer vision. However, the dynamic conditions of space—such as fluctuating illumination and atmospheric changes—can compromise visual sensors, affecting classification reliability. To address this, researchers are exploring the use of proprioceptive sensors, like inertial measurement units (IMUs) and motor joint states, to classify terrain. This approach aims to enhance the robustness and accuracy of rovers during extra-planetary missions by training Neural Networks (NNs) with proprioceptive data and integrating Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) techniques.

Innovations in Sensor Technology

Traditional TC research has focused on visual sensors like cameras and LADAR, but these are vulnerable to environmental conditions. Proprioceptive sensors, which measure internal states like IMUs and torque sensors, offer a more robust alternative. Recent studies have used these sensors with machine learning methods, showing promising results. However, they lacked quantifiable confidence in predictions. To address this, probabilistic UQ methods such as Monte Carlo Dropout, DropConnect, and Flipout have been integrated into DL models, enhancing their reliability for critical tasks.

Experimental Platform: The AsguardIV Rover

The AsguardIV rover, a hybrid leg-wheel rover designed for unstructured environments, was used to collect data. It features rimless wheels for better obstacle traversal and energy efficiency. Data was collected from various terrains mimicking lunar surfaces, including compact and loose sand, and rocky areas.

This rover has been used to
collect an array of data logs from trials executed across
various locations (Credit: De Lucas Álvarez et al., “Terrain Classification Enhanced With Uncertainty for Space Exploration Robots From Proprioceptive Data.”)

Data Collection and Processing

  • Sensors: IMU (6-feature vector), Joint data (12-feature vector), and fused IMU-joint data (18-feature vector).
  • Data Rate: 100 Hz, approximately six hours of data.
  • Splits: 70% training, 30% testing, with further validation splits.
  • Labelling: Terrains labelled for binary classification: rocky terrains as Class 0 (uneven and undeformable) and sand terrains as Class 1 (even and deformable).

The experimental sites for recording data include terrain that is mostly comprised of sand and rock (Credit: De Lucas Álvarez et al., “Terrain Classification Enhanced With Uncertainty for Space Exploration Robots From Proprioceptive Data.”)

Advanced Sequence Generation

The researchers have used the following two methods:

  1. Sliding Window: Extracting subsequences with predefined widths and steps.
  2. Sequence Subsampling: Selecting every fff-th time step to balance sample number and length.

High-Performance Neural Networks

Three NN architectures—CNN, LSTM, and CNN-LSTM—were optimized using Bayesian Optimization with Hyperband (BOHB).

Uncertainty Quantification Techniques

The researcher have integrated Three UQ techniques to enhance reliability:

  1. Monte Carlo Dropout (MC Dropout): Drops activations at inference time.
  2. DropConnect: Drops weights at inference time.
  3. Flipout: Uses variational inference for weight approximation.

Credit: Tesfu Assefa

Compelling Results

All networks were trained using Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 and RTX 2070 graphics cards, employing the Adam optimization algorithm. The Bayesian optimizer had a maximum budget of 50 epochs. 216 BOHB studies were conducted, resulting in 6,480 full-budget candidates.

It is demonstrated as the advantage of integrating UQ techniques into TC models for exploration rovers, ensuring high-confidence outputs with low uncertainty, crucial for navigation safety in space missions. UQ-enhanced models, especially those using Monte Carlo Dropout, show superior performance and trustworthiness.

Future work will involve online testing in analogous scenarios and extending classification to more terrain types. We also aim to use multi-objective optimization techniques, incorporating entropy to generate robust and balanced models that optimise both performance and uncertainty.

Reference

Mariela De Lucas Álvarez et al., “Terrain Classification Enhanced With Uncertainty for Space Exploration Robots From Proprioceptive Data,” July 3, 2024, https://export.arxiv.org/abs/2407.03241.

Let us know your thoughts! Sign up for a Mindplex account now, join our Telegram, or follow us on Twitter. 

Web3 Wars: GameFi Dapps Overtaken By Crypto AI Growth, What’s Next?

Posted on by Werner

TL;DR

  • AI Dapps now have 28% of blockchain activity, surpassing GameFi Dapps at 26%
  • GameFi is still growing: 4 million daily active wallets, up 79% month-over-month.
  • Q2 2024 saw $1.1 billion investment in blockchain gaming; July dropped significantly.

Introduction

Blockchain’s decentralized application (Dapp) industry has witnessed a significant shift in recent months, with artificial intelligence (AI) Dapps surpassing crypto gaming (GameFi) Dapps as the leading category for the very first time. 

This development, highlighted in the July 2024 DappRadar Games Report, means that gaming remains a robust and growing sector, but that AI-powered Dapps are the hotter current tech trends, and hold a bit more mindshare in the space right now. 

AI Dapps Take the Lead

Credit: DappRadar

  • In July 2024, the Dapp industry maintained its impressive milestone of over 15 million daily unique active wallets (dUAW) interacting with blockchain applications. 
  • However, the most striking development was the rise of DappRadar’s ‘Other’ category, which primarily consists of AI-based Dapps, to the top position with a 28% share of user activity. 
  • Gaming Dapps still demonstrated significant growth.The sector now represents 26% of DApp activity, engaging 4 million dUAW – a remarkable 79% increase from the previous month. 

The rise of AI Dapps reflects a broader trend in the tech industry, where artificial intelligence and machine learning are being integrated into sectors from finance to entertainment. In the blockchain space, AI applications are leveraging decentralized networks that provide services from decentralized AI computations by projects like Render to AI-driven data analysis and prediction markets.

Gaming Sector Plays On

Despite being overtaken by AI Dapps, the blockchain gaming sector continues to show strength and innovation. The report highlights several key developments and trends:

1. Blockchain Diversity: Ronin remains the leading blockchain for gaming activity, driven by popular titles like Pixels and Lumiterra. Other networks like opBNB, Oasys, NEAR, and Immutable zkEVM are also seeing significant engagement, showcasing the diverse ecosystem of blockchain gaming platforms.

Credit: DappRadar

2. Emerging Titles: New games like SERAPH: In the Darkness, which launched in mid-July, have quickly gained traction, indicating ongoing innovation and user interest in fresh gaming experiences.

3. NFT Trading: Despite a general decline in metaverse-based NFT collections, gaming NFTs continue to see active trading. Gods Unchained and Axie Infinity remain the most traded gaming NFT collections, while newer entries like Guild of Guardians are gaining popularity.

4. Cross-Platform Integration: The success of games published on major platforms like the App Store and Epic Games Store shows the growing acceptance of blockchain and NFT elements in mainstream gaming channels.

Investment Landscape

The investment climate for blockchain gaming and metaverse projects is a mixed picture. July 2024 saw the lowest investment level since Q3 2020 – just $23 million across three deals – but the preceding quarter (Q2 2024) was notably strong. 

Q2 marked the best quarter for blockchain gaming investments since Q3 2022, with $1.1 billion raised – a 314% increase from the previous quarter.

Key investments in Q2 included:

1. a16z Gaming Fund: Raised $600 million for game studios, infrastructure, and the Games x Consumer ecosystem.

2. Bitkraft Venture Fund: Secured $275 million for early-stage investments in gaming and interactive media companies.

3. Metaverse Projects: Significant investments in Baby Shark Universe ($34 million) and The Sandbox ($20 million) demonstrate ongoing interest in metaverse development.

These investments, focused on infrastructure and foundational development, suggest a strategic approach to enriching the Web3 gaming ecosystem. The contrast between the robust Q2 and the subdued July may indicate a temporary summer lull rather than a long-term trend.

Credit: Tesfu Assefa

GameFi Q2 Industry Snapshot and Analysis

1. User Engagement: Blockchain games remain strong in the Web3 industry, accounting for 26% of all Dapp activity and attracting 2.8 million active wallets daily. This persistent engagement suggests that gaming remains a key driver for Web3 adoption.

2. Blockchain Performance: Ronin has reclaimed the top spot among gaming blockchains, with a 100% increase to 1.9 million dUAW. This indicates the Ronin platform has strong user appeal. Newer platforms like Immutable zkEVM and opBNB grow rapidly.

3. Game Performance: Pixels leads the gaming landscape with 48 million unique wallets this quarter, demonstrating the enduring appeal of well-established titles. The success of newer entries like Guild of Guardians, especially following their mobile launch, shows the potential for growth through strategic platform expansions.

4. Metaverse Developments: Metaverse-based NFT collections saw a 29% decline in trading volume and a 21% drop in sales. Projects like Animoca Brands’ Mocaverse continue to dominate, capturing half of the trading volume. This suggests that while the metaverse concept may be experiencing reduced hype, established projects are maintaining their market positions.

5. Technological Advancements: The industry continues to focus on seamless gameplay experiences, investing in infrastructure and cross-chain compatibility. This focus on user experience is crucial to acquire and retain users.

6. Friend or Foe? The rise of AI Dapps presents both a challenge and an opportunity to GameFi. Gaming developers may need to integrate AI elements to stay competitive, potentially leading to more sophisticated and engaging gameplay experiences.

Looking Ahead

Despite the challenges, the blockchain gaming industry shows promising signs for future growth, especially if the 2024/2025 crypto bull run gets back on track.

New game launches are succeeding, and lots of blockchain platforms are getting traction. These trends show continuing innovation in tech, in gameplay, tokenomics, and user engagement strategies. There is potential crossover with traditional gaming platforms (as we’ve seen with Gunzilla and PS5), and interest from established tech companies. Broader industry collaborations will help the GameFi industry scale beyond what we’ve seen.

Significant investments in gaming funds and infrastructure projects continue to lay the groundwork for more sophisticated and scalable blockchain gaming experiences. Also, the rise of AI Dapps may lead to innovative hybrid models, combining elements of AI and gaming to create new, engaging experiences for users.

The rise of AI Dapps presents both a challenge and an opportunity for the GameFi sector to evolve and integrate new technologies. The capital is there. Substantial investments in Web3 gaming, infrastructure, emerging platforms, and cross-industry collaborations are laying the foundations for an exciting next phase of blockchain gaming evolution.

Let us know your thoughts! Sign up for a Mindplex account now, join our Telegram, or follow us on Twitter. 

Combining Knowledge Graphs and Large Language Models

Posted on by YOSEF

Introduction

The growing interest in integrating Knowledge Graphs (KGs) and Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance Natural Language Processing (NLP) applications is large. LLMs, such as BERT, GPT, and T5, have achieved state-of-the-art performance in various NLP tasks but still exhibit limitations, such as generating hallucinations (false information) and lacking domain-specific knowledge. KGs, on the other hand, provide structured and accurate information about entities and their relationships, which can complement LLMs’ capabilities. Even though LLMs are powerful NLP models trained on vast amounts of text data to understand and generate human language, they sometimes produce incorrect or nonsensical information, especially in domain-specific contexts.

So what are KGs and how can they improve LLMS? Knowledge Graphs (KGs): are databases that represent information in a structured format, with entities (nodes) connected by relationships (edges). They capture the semantics and interconnections between entities, making them valuable for enhancing the factual accuracy and domain knowledge of LLMs.

Methods for Enhancing LLMs with KGs

  1. Knowledge Injection: KAPING (Knowledge-Augmented Pre-trained Language Models) and DRAK (Dynamic Relational Attention Knowledge) are techniques that inject factual knowledge from KGs into LLMs to provide context and improve performance in tasks like zero-shot question answering. This helps LLMs generate more accurate and relevant responses by leveraging structured knowledge. 
  • Example: Injecting information about medical conditions and treatments from a medical KG into an LLM to improve its performance in medical question-answering tasks.
  1. Increasing Explainability: Methods like QA-GNN (Question Answering with Graph Neural Networks) and LMExplainer integrate KGs with LLMs to provide better interpretability and reasoning paths for the model’s outputs. By incorporating KGs, these methods can trace back the sources of information and explain how a particular answer was derived. 
  • Example: Using a KG to provide reasoning paths for answers generated by an LLM, making it easier to understand the logic behind the model’s responses in a legal context.
  1. Semantic Understanding: Approaches like LUKE (Language Understanding with Knowledge-based Embeddings) and R3 (Relational Reasoning for Reading Comprehension) enhance LLMs by adding semantic understanding and entity embeddings from KGs. This allows LLMs to better comprehend the relationships between entities and generate more coherent and contextually appropriate responses.
  • Example: Enhancing an LLM with embeddings from a geographic KG to improve its understanding of geographical entities and relationships in tasks like location-based question answering.

Methods for Enhancing KGs with LLMs

  1. Temporal Forecasting: LLMs are used to predict future facts in Temporal Knowledge Graphs (TKGs) by understanding the semantic meaning of entities and relationships over time. This helps in forecasting events and trends based on historical data stored in KGs.
  • Example: Using an LLM to predict future business trends by analyzing historical data on company performances and market conditions stored in a TKG.
  1. Knowledge Graph Construction: LLMs assist in the construction of KGs by performing tasks like relation extraction, entity recognition, and property identification. This automates the process of building and updating KGs, making it more efficient and accurate.
  • Example: Using an LLM to extract relationships between scientific concepts from research papers and incorporate them into a scientific KG.

Brief Thematic Analysis 

There is a complementary relationship between KGs and LLMs, and their integration can significantly improve the performance and trustworthiness of AI applications. The key themes include:

  1. Accuracy and Reliability: Integrating KGs with LLMs improves the factual accuracy and reliability of the models by providing structured and verified information.
  2. Explainability and Interpretability: Methods that combine KGs and LLMs enhance the explainability of model outputs, making it easier to understand and trust the generated information.
  3. Efficiency and Automation: Using LLMs to construct and maintain KGs automates the process, reducing the time and effort required for manual updates.

Credit: Tesfu Assefa

Conclusion

The integration of KGs and LLMs offers a promising approach to addressing the limitations of LLMs and enhancing the capabilities of KGs. It is a discussion of current and future challenges in this field, providing insights for researchers and practitioners interested in this area. The key takeaways include:

  1. Mutual Benefits: KGs provide structured and domain-specific knowledge to LLMs, reducing hallucinations and improving accuracy, while LLMs enhance the construction and updating of KGs, making the process more efficient.
  2. Research Directions: Future research should focus on developing more sophisticated methods for integrating KGs and LLMs, addressing challenges such as scalability, dynamic updates, and context awareness.
  3. Practical Applications: The integration of KGs and LLMs has significant implications for various NLP applications, including question answering, information retrieval, and knowledge management.

Key Points

  • Knowledge Injection: Techniques like KAPING and DRAK use KGs to provide additional context and facts to LLMs, improving their performance in tasks such as zero-shot question answering.
  • Explainability: Methods like QA-GNN and LMExplainer integrate KGs with LLMs to provide better interpretability and reasoning paths for the models’ outputs.
  • Semantic Understanding: Approaches like LUKE and R3 enhance LLMs by adding semantic understanding and entity embeddings from KGs.
  • Temporal Forecasting: LLMs are used to predict future facts in Temporal Knowledge Graphs (TKGs) by understanding the semantic meaning of entities and relationships over time.
  • KG Construction: LLMs assist in the construction of KGs by performing tasks like relation extraction and property identification, making the process more automated and accurate.

Let us know your thoughts! Sign up for a Mindplex account now, join our Telegram, or follow us on Twitter.